White Rabbit Cult Political Forum  
This Day in History

Go Back   White Rabbit Cult Political Forum > Political Issues > Law & Justice

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2011, 02:30 AM
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MY HOME IS ON THE NORTHERN EDGE OF GOODSTUFF'S LUNAR CRATER AND WE ARE CLAIMING SQUATTERS RIGHTS
Posts: 118
Thanks: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Angry Brady vs Loughner

looks like in 1994 Judge Roll (one of the victims) found that background check provisions of Brady Law were unconstititonal

In Arizona, U.S. District Court Judge John Roll has become the third federal judge to agree that part of the Brady Law violates the Tenth Amendment. He is the first to say that part of the Brady Law also violates the Fifth Amendment.

Judge Roll's opinion does not knock out the waiting period for handgun purchases, but it does strike at the very concept of the federal government requiring local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks.

ONLINE PROFILING - POLITICAL ASSASSIN
GOODSTUFF'S CYBER WORLD - ONLINE PROFILING - POLITICAL ASSASSIN
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
goodstuff, jared lee loughner, online profiling, political assassin, tucson shooting

« jump bernie jump! | - »
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2009 WhiteRabbitCult.com